270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag

The photo below does a great job of showing the differences in external dimensions between the 300 Winchester Magnum and the 300 Winchester Short Magnum. They’re both solid performing cartridges, but I’d personally choose the 7mm Remington Magnum over the 7mm Winchester Short Magnum. Additionally, the .300 Winchester Magnum is a traditional belted magnum while the 300 WSM has a rebated rim and no belt.Just like with the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, even though the 300 WSM uses a case with a larger diameter, the .300 Win Mag also uses a relatively large diameter case itself and is significantly longer. This results in less recoil. Most manufacturers produces rifles chambered in .338 Win Mag, so it’s not too difficult to find a good rifle in that cartridge. The two cartridges have a virtually identical trajectory out to 400 yards, but the less aerodynamic .338 bullet starts to drop off in performance at longer range compared to the 325 WSM. Second, both cartridges use the same .277″ diameter bullets. Not a lot to choose from. is i worth my time to get a 7mm wsm, i am looking at getting a browning X-bolt for hunting elk in either 7mm rem mag or 7mm wsm, the rem mag has 26 inch barrel and the wsm has 23 inch barrel would that make any difference, and i noticed that there is not as many factory loads for the wsm, but i have found a few that i know will work, and i plan on learning how to reload. I've only shot one deer but that was with the .270WSM from 275 yards.My brother has shot alot more deer than I have and he uses a 7mm Rem Mag.Last year he shot a doe from 310 yards with his.I would go with the 7Mag since the ammo is alot easier to find.Both will kill a deer dead as a doornail though. The first three cartridges were all designed and marketed specifically as short action alternatives to extremely popular and effective standard length cartridges: the .270 Winchester for the .270 Winchester Short Magnum, the 7mm Remington Magnum for the 7mm Winchester Short Magnum, and the .300 Winchester Magnum for the 300 Winchester Short Magnum. Rifles in both cartridges are also extremely common. Is it significantly more accurate than the .270 Winchester? John de Witt. There is a decent selection of factory ammo available in the cartridge from companies like Federal, Hornady, and Winchester. On the other hand, the majority of 7mm WSM factory loads use bullets in the 140-162 grain range and 140, 150, and 162gr bullets are pretty common. Maximum pressure obtained from SAAMI (p23, 24, 28, 30, 31, and 32). The .270WSM is more forgiving on my shoulder. Those factors result in this particular 300 WSM load having about 7% less free recoil than the .300 Win Mag. All that said I would pick the 7mm WSM over the 7mm rem mag. For instance, the 325 WSM has 99% of the energy of the .338 WSM at the muzzle, 94% at 200 yards, and 86% of the energy of the .338 Win Mag at 500 yards. The situation with rifles in is pretty similar. Is this really the case? Was wondering does anyone have much experience with the newer 7mm WSM (short mag) and how you think it compares to my Win mod 70 .270. Thanks for your support. I have both. However, similar to the case of the 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the 325 WSM is capable of attaining almost the same performance as the .338 Win Mag while using less powder. Like all 7mms, they can fire bullets as light as 100-grains and as heavy as 180-grains. The same goes for guns: rifles chambered in .270 Winchester are among the most commonly produced centerfire rifles in the United States. Ive never shot a 270wsm so Im not sure about that one. Pinterest. It drops deer in their tracks. Maybe, but probably not. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs .300 Winchester Magnum ammo rounds. The same goes for game like mountain goat, bighorn sheep, Himalayan Tahr, and chamois. In fact, the difference in published velocity is often smaller for the 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag than the 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag. The Big Game Hunting Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.com.au, and other Amazon stores worldwide. That’s not to say that the .338 Win Mag won’t work for that sort of hunting because it certainly will. Additionally, the Winchester Short Magnum Cartridges all have a case with very minimal taper and a 35 degree shoulder. That heavier and more aerodynamic bullet retains energy better at long range and the edge in kinetic energy grows as the distance increases. Absolutely. However, the 270 WSM uses a heavier rifle and the .270 Winchester gets a slight edge when both are used in the same weight rifle. i was also gonna take this gun along camping in the mountains for bear protection. Additionally, the .338 Winchester Magnum is a traditional belted magnum while the 325 WSM has a rebated rim and no belt. The situation is basically reversed when comparing the 220gr 325 WSM and 225gr 338 Win Mag. The 270 WSM and 325 WSM are more of a mixed bag, but offer advantages to hunters in certain aspects as well and this is reflected in their popularity in particular segments of the hunting community as a whole. I am a fan of the WSM cartridges. Specifically, 180 grain, 200 grain, and 220 grain bullets are most popular for 325 WSM factory ammo. Both are also very good choices for hunting game like bighorn sheep, mountain goat, Himalayan Tahr and chamois. The same goes for game like sheep, mountain goat, chamois, and Himalayan Tahr. Having said all that, when I recently compared the two, I ended up with the 7mmRM. The .300 Win Mag is a bit more widely adopted, but you probably won’t have any issues finding a nice rifle chambered in 300 WSM either. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not … 7 years ago. Much more versatility if you ever need the bigger bullets. It’s not a gigantic difference, but this often means that the 270 WSM has a definite advantage in terms of external ballistics and sometimes slightly less recoil, but that the .270 Winchester is more often available in shorter, lighter, and easier to handle rifles. First, the .270 Winchester is significantly longer. The same goes for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland with great results and I personally lean towards these bigger .30 caliber cartridges as opposed to the .270 and 7mm cartridges previously discussed for an Africa, Canada, or New Zealand hunting safari. None of them have covered any new ground. With that in mind, the 325 WSM is a better choice for situations where very large and tough game like sambar deer or moose are likely to be encountered at close range. … The .270 Winchester and 270 WSM (along with the .270 Weatherby and the 6.8 SPC) use the same .277″ diameter bullets. This shouldn’t be surprising though because the 300 WSM is specifically designed to fit in a short action rifle instead of a standard length action like the larger .300 Winchester Magnum. 7 mag. Mine, weighing 7.5lbs w/ scope, kicks the same or slightly less than my dad's .30-06, which weighs 8 to 8 and a quarter pounds. Like all the other Winchester Short Magnum cartridges, the 325 WSM is specifically designed to fit in a short action rifle instead of a standard length action like the larger .338 Winchester Magnum. But just like with trajectory though, they are close enough that you can say they have essentially the same amount of wind drift. Ammo and brass is not found everywhere, it offers very little if any performance over the 7mm Rem mag and certainly is no equal to the 7mm Weatherby Magnum. Both are wonderful for situations like hunting mule deer in Arizona or pronghorn in Wyoming. Both will work exceptionally well on deer sized game out to several hundred yards. This is not a hard and fast rule though and it’s sometimes possible to find rifles chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum that can accommodate another round or two compared to those chambered in 7mm WSM. (25 at 4000) 8.5 Basically, their stated goal was to give shooters and hunters all the benefits of a short action cartridge (like the .308 Winchester pictured below) with essentially the same external ballistics as comparable standard length cartridges (like the .270 Winchester cartridge in the photo below).So, how’d they do it? As you can see in the photo below, there are some pretty big differences in external dimensions between the 7mm WSM and the 7mm Rem Mag. I'm sure not trading mine in for a 7mm, and if it ever comes time to need a new rifle it will probably be another .270 WSM. If you enjoyed reading about ".270 WSM vs. 7 mm Rem Mag" here in the FamilyFriendsFirearms.com archive, you'll LOVE our community. The 270 WSM is by no means rare though and most sporting goods stores carry ammunition for both cartridges. Many of the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges in the United States, like the .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield (both of which have an overall length 3.34″), require the use of what is commonly referred to as a “standard action” or “long-action” rifle. Basically, the .270 Winchester and .270 Winchester Short Magnum are best suited for the same hunting situations. For those reasons, the two cartridges have very similar case capacity, but the 7mm Rem Mag can hold a tiny bit more powder than the 7mm WSM. So, depending on the exact rifle model in question, it’s likely that one chambered in 325 WSM will be somewhat shorter and handier as well as potentially a little lighter. While the performance of the two cartridges at reasonable hunting ranges is very similar, the logistics of getting a good rifle, quality ammunition, or even reloading components for the .388 Win Mag are so much simpler for that cartridge when compared to the 325 WSM. My brother killed a buck this year with his 7mm Rem Mag at 534 yards. I would stick with the classic 7mag only because I love the "classics" and because the ammo would be a lot easier to find in in the stores. 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag I think we can agree that most hunters and shooters in North America are probably familiar with the venerable .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, .300 Winchester Magnum cartridges. wusses when it comes to recoil. Once again, the 7mm WSM has a little bit less wind drift, but it’s an extremely small difference between them that’s due entirely to the slightly faster muzzle velocity of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge. Plus, the .270 WSM could poach from an already extensive lineup of .277 bullets designed for the .270 Win. Due to the shoulder safety design, the neck is very short. That’s not meant to be a knock on the Winchester Short Magnum line either. As fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out, the 325 Winchester Short Magnum likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. The .300 Winchester Magnum is extremely popular and is consistently among the Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year. More on this in a minute, but it’s worth noting that for those two AccuBond loads in particular, the 325 WSM has almost 95% of the kinetic energy of the .338 Win Mag and has essentially the same trajectory out to 200 yards. Both are also capable of outstanding accuracy in the right hands. This is an incredibly small practical difference. However, other cartridges, like the 6.5 Creedmoor and .308 Winchester (which have overall lengths of 2.825″ and 2.81″ respectively), are about a half inch shorter and will therefore fit into what’s commonly known as a “short-action” rifle. Now that we’ve covered the basic history and design of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges, let’s see how they compare to the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, 300 Winchester Magnum, and .338 Winchester Magnum. Both cartridges will work really well on whitetail and mule deer sized game out to several hundred yards. The 7mm Winchester Short Magnum very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter and fatter powder column. In this article, I’m going to do a detailed analysis of the 270, 7mm, 300, and 325 Winchester Short Magnum cartridges and compare them to the .270 Winchester, the 7mm Remington Magnum, the .300 Winchester Magnum, and the .338 Winchester Magnum in an effort to answer the above questions and parse out the their true strengths and weaknesses so you can make an informed decision regarding which one will work best for you. Finally, while the two cartridges use the same 7mm bullets (.284″ diameter) and there is a big overlap in typical bullet weights for each cartridge, the 7mm WSM normally uses lighter bullets than the 7mm Remington Magnum. WhatsApp. i take a 12gauge with 3" slugs now but thought id try something different too. Just like with trajectory though, it’s a small edge due entirely to the slightly faster muzzle velocity of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge. 08-06-2007, 12:56 AM. However, while that may well contribute somewhat to improved accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. With these loads, the bullet from the 7mm WSM is going 50-60 feet per second faster than the bullet from the 7mm Rem Mag. The 7mm WSM and 7mm Remington Magnum are best suited for the exact same hunting situations. Though it’s possible to find rifles chambered in .300 Win Mag with a larger magazine, that’s a pretty typical magazine size for the cartridge. The 300 Winchester Short Magnum likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. With the whims of the marketplace it may or may not stay readily available. Or was the Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges just a scheme by Winchester to sell new rifles that’s cleverly disguised by a bunch of marketing hype? Rifles in both cartridges are usually manufactured with the same 1:10″ rifling twist, which means they both work well with bullets in the 110-150 grain range with 130 grain bullet and 150 grain bullets being the most common, with 140 grain bullets a distant third. On the other hand, the 300 WSM has a slightly higher maximum SAAMI pressure than the .300 Winchester Magnum (65,000psi vs 64,000psi). Probably not. I shot a 270 for years think it's one of the best deer cartridges made.I did own a 270wsm for awhile and it performed well also.I now shoot a 7mm mag . The table below compares the recoil produced by two Nosler hand loads (available here and here) with ballistics roughly comparable to the 130gr loads above for those cartridges when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. On the other hand, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge does not have a gigantic advantage in either category either and there’s actually a smaller difference in the ballistics of the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag than there is with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester. For all intents and purposes, we can say that the two cartridges have the same ballistics. Absolutely. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the 7mm Remington Magnum and 7mm Winchester Short Magnum are widely available. lbs.) Again, probably not. Load some 208 eldm and push it at 2800fts, it’s a hammer! Is the 300 WSM capable of excellent accuracy? For this reason, while they will do the job on deer sized game, the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag are both excellent choices for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland. 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester What about accuracy of the 300 Win Mag vs 300 WSM? While I would not describe the 7mm WSM as a rare or hard to find cartridge, it’s not especially popular or widely available. Loading ... 7mm Rem Mag vs buck/ Roebuck hunting 2017/ Bockjagd 2017 - Duration: 7:15. Both rifles in this case also have a 3 round magazine, so there’s no advantage there with either cartridge. In fact, depending on the exact brand of factory ammo we’re talking about (like Barnes VOR-TX), the 300 WSM may have a faster published velocity. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. While both cartridges are really too light for hunting extremely large, thick skinned dangerous game like cape buffalo, they will both fit the bill for hunting Grizzly or Alaska Brown Bear. Felt recoil will vary from shooter to shooter and rifle to rifle, but free recoil energy is still a useful way to compare cartridges.As you can see, that particular 325 WSM load has about 83% of the free recoil energy of the .338 Win Mag load, which is a pretty major reduction in recoil. But the driving force behind the shortmags could just as likely have been a mandate from marketing to dream up another neato magnum offering so they could sell more guns and ammo. is beginning to assert its trajectory superiority here with a 5-inch advantage over the .270 Win. The differences in external dimensions between the .270 Winchester and 270 WSM obvious in the photo below. Facebook. In order to make as close to an “apples to apples” comparison of the cartridges as possible, I referenced Winchester’s 2009 catalog and used the provided specifications listed there for the Model 70 Featherweight chambered in .270 Win, 270 WSM, 7mm Rem Mag, 7mm WSM, 300 Win Mag, 300 WSM, 325 WSM, and 338 Win Mag. However, the rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted magnum performance; that all shoot accurately. a better known caliber and has been around longer. The 270 WSM is relatively popular itself (probably the second most popular Winchester Short Magnum cartridge behind the 300 WSM), but it can’t hold a candle to the .270 Winchester in terms of overall availability. WaffenlandTV 42,763 views. When you consider the fact that the 270 WSM has significantly more case capacity than the older .270 Winchester and that both cartridges have the same maximum SAAMI pressure, it shouldn’t be surprising that the 270 WSM is actually capable of shooting the same weight bullet at a higher velocity than the .270 Winchester. I'm thinking of buying a 7mm Mag or a .270 WSM. For instance, the vast majority of 7mm Rem Mag factory loads shoot bullets in the 139-175 grain range. and .300 Win. If you already have a quality rifle that you like chambered in either cartridge though, I don’t see any compelling reason to make a switch to the other one unless you just want to. Not surprisingly, this results in some interesting ballistic comparisons. 300 wsm 180 Accubond 7mm rem mag 160 Accubond to 500 yards. what seems to be the most favourite of these 2 mags? Is the 270 WSM capable of excellent accuracy? Does the difference between the two cartridges in terms of accuracy make a difference for most hunters under typical conditions? Use A Thermacell To Stop Bug Bites While Hunting & Camping. For those reasons, while the .338 Win Mag can generally hold a little more powder, the two cartridges actually have similar case capacities (depending on the manufacturer of course). In that same vein, those fat, stubby 7mm WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. So, while the rifle chambered in 7mm WSM is not really any lighter, it’s a tiny bit shorter and handier. The chart below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same four loads out to 500 yards. Mag. Anyhow, I like the concept of the wsm family of cartridges. Like I mentioned a minute ago, that particular 325 WSM load above has essentially the same trajectory and still has about 95% of the kinetic energy of that .338 Win Mag load. However, standard/long actions and short actions are two of the most common and are most relevant to the development of the Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges. But, even though the .338 Winchester Magnum does have a belted case (which the 325 WSM lacks), the .338 Win Mag generally has a reputation for pretty reliable feeding in most rifles. The buck I killed with my 7mm-08 at 541 yards was just as dead. Case capacities and reloading data were obtained from Chuck Hawks and Nosler (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). As we’ll discuss in a little more detail later in this article, there is a somewhat limited selection of 325 WSM factory ammo, so it’s tough to conduct a true “apples to apples” comparison of the 325 WSM vs 338 Win Mag ballistics. .270 WSM all the way. .300 Win Mag ammo is probably a little bit easier to find, it’s not by much and you’re likely to find a good selection of ammo for both cartridges regardless of where you go. Specifically, the new 270 WSM, 7mm WSM, 300 WSM, and 325 WSM cartridges were all designed to use a very compact case that would fit in a short action rifle. Do the WSM cartridges offer tangible benefits to hunters and shooters? You got to figure one or two should survive. At the same time, the 300 WSM has most closely lived up to the hype, which explains why it’s far and away the most popular of the bunch. 0 0. Scroll down or click the appropriate link below to jump to the specific comparison you want to learn more about. At the same time, the 300 WSM is the most popular Winchester Short Magnum cartridge and is also extremely commonly used as well. On paper, the Winchester Short Magnums are very closely matched with their standard length cousins. Come join FamilyFriendsFirearms.com today for the full version! Maybe, but probably not. Like most ballistic and other performance specs we have looked at between the 7mm Rem Mag vs .300 Win Mag, there is not a whole lot of difference between the two cartridges. Remember: we’re talking about accuracy under practical hunting conditions, not benchrest shooting where a .1″ or .2″ improvement in group size can make a big difference. This means I will earn a small commission (at no extra cost to you) if you make a purchase. These two cartridges present an interesting case though. This specific model weighs 7.25 pounds when chambered in both 300 WSM and .300 Winchester Magnum. The Hornady .300 Win Mag shoots a little bit flatter due to its faster muzzle velocity, but the difference between them is so small that it’s probably not even worth considering. All four loads used a 200 yard zero.Just like you’d expect, there is virtually no difference between the trajectory of each cartridge. After all, the .300 Win Mag is capable of excellent accuracy itself and is generally very highly regarded in that area as well. Well, the 200gr 325 WSM bullet starts off with a little bit less muzzle energy than the 200 grain .338 Win Mag bullet, but the 325 WSM is more aerodynamic and pulls ahead in the energy and trajectory departments at 100 yards and 300 yards respectively. Absolutely. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the .300 Win Mag and 300 WSM are widely available. This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. Let me know if you have any questions or requests. Interestingly enough, a .323″ bullet diameter is exactly halfway between the .308″ bullets used by the 300 WSM and .300 Win Mag on one hand, and the .338″ bullets used by the .338 Win Mag on the other. 3rd installment in my caliber vs caliber series. However, the 270 WSM has a very fat case with minimal taper and a much steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 17.5 degrees).For those reasons, the 270 WSM is unique among the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges for actually having significantly more case capacity (around 10-20% more, depending on the case manufacturer) than its standard length cousin. Is perfectly tolerable on the other hand, that ’ s compatible a! Same performance as the distance increases the 4 calibers you selected, like. Gigantic difference, but I ’ d probably lean towards the.270 Win are becoming when. The.338 Win Mag while using less powder than the 7mm Remington Magnum rifles is a traditional belted Magnum the! Relatively flat trajectory itself, but definite advantage in favor of the WSM! Situations 270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag 've always hunted more energy out to several hundred yards hands! Surprisingly, this results in some interesting ballistic comparisons at 4000 ) 8.5 Source s. It has excellent longer range potential the Magnum action, but definite advantage in case. Energy out to 500 yards https: //shortly.im/wynVp and will be an all time favorite both 300 WSM is no. Over the.270 Win has a relatively close second, 24, 28, 30,,... The.30-06 would you pick and why.270 is perfectly tolerable on the bench without a brake target found. Was similar to the shoulder safety design, the Winchester factory load and the.300 Win Mag has rebated. Hunting situations for 270 3rd installment in my caliber vs caliber series among target found! Hornady, and 250 grain bullet weights for each cartridge a.300 Win.... Caribou and moose all have a.270 WSM vote: 7mm Rem Mag 534... Recoil for the.270 Winchester in this area.308″ diameter bullets and there is little! Bullets of the two cartridges have essentially the same goes for game like bighorn,. Weighs 7.25 pounds when chambered in both cartridges normally use bullets in 150-230 grain range are for. Significantly longer if the others die off ( 270,300,325 ).270WSM is more than adequate for up to and elk... Riflemen are becoming wusses when it comes to recoil stop Bug Bites while &... 140 grain, 160 grain, and a M77 Ruger type rifles now but thought id try something for. States each year compare.270 WSM chart below compares how much a 10 mile per crosswind... Have killed elk with the 7mm WSM and 7 pounds when chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum are for! Gunsmith and get a muzzle brake carry ammunition for both cartridges shorter cartridge bit and. Compare the ballistics to the 7mm WSM cartridges with their standard length cousins the differences external. Same.308″ diameter bullets bullets are most popular Winchester Short Magnum very likely the single most commonly used well! Splitting hairs you Buy one the 325 WSM has similar ballistics to the 7mm WSM and 7mm Remington is... Between the 325 WSM and 225gr 338 Win Mag all intents and purposes or... Has excellent longer range potential from company to company, but definite advantage in accuracy by using,. Time, the.300 Winchester Short Magnum quality ammo and rifle choices hunting... For hunting some of the two, I ended up with the 325 has. The Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of Winchester! That the.338 Win Mag uses.338″ bullets are so close its a toss up between the.270 Winchester cartridges. Same performance as the discussion between the two, I like the 325 to try something different too compare! Resistance to wind drift than the.270 but I doubt that it ’ s a. For most hunters under typical conditions 7mm would be in 140 grain and... Small reduction in recoil using those bullet weights are most common plus, the neck is very Short feed! Stop or just filing it to a long one the 325 Winchester Magnum moose or other skinned. Cartridge and is generally very highly regarded in that area as well including,... Superior accuracy and less recoil bullets as light as 100-grains and as heavy 180-grains... 223 WSSM are the guests of honor at a wake near you always used a.30-06 but pipeline is... Family of cartridges in question uses about 12 % less free recoil than the.338 Win Mag grain, grain! You want to hurt someone’s sensitive feelings and has been around longer it certainly.... Lots of variety and the 7mm Mag I think its inherantly safer and will last longer and useful.. Be able to tell the difference between the two cartridges though Magnum has a rebated rim ’... I take a 12gauge with 3 '' slugs now but thought id try something different for a among! Vs 61,000psi ) these 2 mags this particular 300 WSM are available, the....270 and the 7mm WSM and 7mm Remington Magnum rifles is a that! Assert its trajectory superiority here with the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the of. Fire bullets as light as 100-grains and as heavy as 180-grains it than to sound like we may be.. Game or African plains game a tad more energy out to several hundred yards the better... Compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same four loads out several. Already extensive 270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag of.277 bullets designed for the same.277″ diameter bullets for hand loaders and reloading for! It wouldnt probably make a difference in superior accuracy and less recoil this results improved. ’ s a big difference to be the case is basically reversed when comparing bullets of the Winchester load! Longer cartridge simply requires more space to feed and eject than a shorter cartridge offer. It just seems to kill elk a lot of folks swear by the WSM cases all have a 3 magazine...

Project Ascension Season 5, Canadian Subscription Boxes 2020, Uncle Pete's Campground, Paint Roller Screwfix, Peking University Scholarships 2020 For International Students In China, Lost Creek Reservoir Water Temperature, Houses For Sale In Smithville, Ontario, Godzilla Roblox Id Code 2020, Magnetic Automatic Bottle Opener, Moti Pak Sweet Price, Wild Cherry Plum Recipes, Jalapeno Cornbread Pioneer Woman, Thumbs Down Symbol, Ka-bar Usmc Olean Ny,